Log in

No account? Create an account

The Bowels of the Abyss

Recent Entries

Journal Info

Piano Society


December 31st, 2020

(no subject)

What's your sun sign?Collapse )

July 28th, 2020

(no subject)


"the law of the strong:
this is our law
and the joy of the world."
AL. II. 2

"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law."
--AL. I. 40

"thou hast no right but to do thy will. Do that, and no other shall say nay." --AL. I. 42-3

"Every man and every woman is a star." --AL. I.3

There is no god but man.

1. Man has the right to live by his own law
-- to live in the way that he wills to do:
to work as he will:
to play as he will:
to rest as he will:
to die when and how he will.

2. Man has the right to eat what he will:
to drink what he will:
to dwell where he will:
to move as he will on the face of the earth.

3. Man has the right to think what he will:
to speak what he will:
to write what he will:
to draw, paint, carve, etch, mould, build as he will:
to dress as he will.

4. Man has the right to love as he will:
-- "take your fill and will of love as ye will,when, where, and with whom ye will." --AL. I. 51

5. Man has the right to kill those who would thwart these rights.

"the slaves shall serve." --AL. II. 58

"Love is the law, love under will." --AL. I. 57

August 31st, 2010

Due to the increasing amounts of spam, worms, trojan horses, and other malware, the time is ripe for a war to commence against such people that propagate malware online. Therefore this is a call to arms for everyone to work towards the total elimination of online BS. All kids that are still of school age should make it one of their top priorities to actively seek out other students to determine their web presence and activities. Any classmates that engage in sending spam or viruses or engage in any other form of Internet malice should be beaten senseless, and the fingers on both of their hands should be permanently broken and crippled; preventing them from ever using a keyboard again. This should not be seen as bad, nor should it be defined as a criminal act; on the contrary, it would constitute a good service for humanity to rid the earth of script-kiddie scum and spammers. Local law enforcement officials must turn their heads aside and not notice the assault of any script-kiddies or spammers - which must be considered outlaw. Only by filling everyone with absolute fear for their lives in the event that they decide to spam (etc), can we hope to rid the earth of this scum. The idea of people hiding behind a computer terminal to mess up other people's lives, is the epitome of cowardice - and all cowards must be put down!

Furthermore, this farce of not being able to do anything about such problems is offensive. Nothing online is anonymous. Every computer has a universally unique identification number etched into the chipset itself (MAC address). This means that every computer that logs in to the Internet can be traced back, not only to the exact computer in use, but also forms a link with financial and personal records of every user. Suggesting that it's too difficult to catch the scumbags is quite simply a bold-faced lie. The technology exists today to pinpoint individuals' physical locations to within a few feet, indoors or outdoors. Even if someone believes their Internet traffic is anonymous, it's not! since even the "Anonymizer" sites are required by law to keep records of every user that logs in to their server - as are all businesses. What this means is that it should be actually quite simple to trace back the source of all spam, and additionally tracking down the specific a**hole that sources such crap should be a simple matter. Additionally, the Federal government under the Obama administration has greatly expanded the Department of Homeland Security and the NSA to include entire departments of hackers working for the Fed. These "government hackers", instead of making the Internet a safer place for your children, and a more enjoyable place for adults, instead of such aims, they occupy their time with decreasing Internet connectivity and creating Trojan Horse programs with which to infect people's computers. That's right! We are all paying the Federal government to create viruses with which to infect our own computers. This farce ends now!

In conclusion, a dead script-kiddie can no longer scan ports! If we can get an entire generation to actively bring about this transformation, tomorrow's Internet can be spam-free, virus-free, malware-free! Don't sit by idly while others destroy our freedoms! Kill a spammer!


P.S. An excessive increase of spam motivated me to trace it back to its source. The spam is all being hosted by a server in Oklahoma City, OK by a company called IIC Internet LLC. Here's some information about them.

IIC Internet LLC
201 S Robert S Kerr
Oklahoma City, OK 73102


By Email - support@iicinternet.com

This company specializes in hosting spammers. Please return the favour and show them your appreciation of spam through mail, phone, or e-mail. They obviously love spam since there business exists by hosting spammers. This company has even been included in the online Ripoff Report for their business practices. At that site there is this contact information:

IIC Internet Services, Onlinestoragesolution.com
15323 Saddleback Road
Santa Clarita California 91387
Phone: 661-251-8747

Following these links to the Onlinestoragesolution.com which is just another front for IIC Internet LLC, gains the following information:

Business Office:

Online Storage Solution
201 S Robert S Kerr Ste 911
Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Oklahoma City Data Center
Bank Of Oklahoma Plaza
201 S Robert S Kerr
Oklahoma City Oklahoma

Rural Off Site Data Storage Vault and Support Center
Jones, Oklahoma

Network Operations Center
Lancaster, California


Need Something Special. We can design custom storage solutions at unbeatable prices.

Monday-Friday 8am-5pm Central Time

and yet more:

Registrar: TUCOWS INC.
Whois Server: whois.tucows.com
Referral URL: http://domainhelp.opensrs.net
Name Server: NS1.WEB229.NET
Name Server: NS2.WEB229.NET
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 02-nov-2008
Creation Date: 28-dec-1998
Expiration Date: 28-dec-2011

Administrative Contact:
herzig, chris XXXXXXX@iicinternet.com
15900 Persimmon Creek
Jones, OK 73049
Technical Contact:
herzig, chris XXXXXXX@iicinternet.com
15900 Persimmon Creek
Jones, OK 73049

Registration Service Provider:
IIC Internet Services, XXXXXXX@iicinternet.com
This company may be contacted for domain login/passwords,
DNS/Nameserver changes, and general domain support questions.

Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.
Record last updated on 13-Apr-2009.
Record expires on 28-Dec-2011.
Record created on 28-Dec-1998.

Registrar Domain Name Help Center:

Domain servers in listed order:

Domain status: clientDeleteProhibited

and finally...

ASNumber: 36816
ASHandle: AS36816
RegDate: 2006-05-04
Updated: 2006-05-04
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS36816

OrgName: IIC Internet LLC
Address: 15900 Persimmon Creek
City: Jones
StateProv: OK
PostalCode: 73049
Country: US
RegDate: 2002-07-19
Updated: 2010-04-05
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/IICINT

OrgTechHandle: SRB10-ARIN
OrgTechName: Bennet, Stephen R
OrgTechPhone: +1-661-251-8747
OrgTechEmail: steve@iicinternet.com
OrgTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/SRB10-ARIN

RAbuseHandle: CJH5-ARIN
RAbuseName: Herzig, Christopher James
RAbusePhone: +1-661-251-8747
RAbuseEmail: chris@iicinternet.com
RAbuseRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/CJH5-ARIN

Please show them how much spam is appreciated. :-)

June 22nd, 2009

Propaganda, again???

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

Does the international media (in other words, Associated Press and Reuters) really still think that we're all soooooo stupid that we can't see through their Israeli agenda propaganda??? First we have the media crying to the heavens that the Iranian government is some kind of delusional conspiracy nut to accuse the U.S.A. and U.K. of being behind the protests. Then, all of a sudden these new protesters show up carrying signs declaring "I am Neda."

Full story here

Unfortunately nobody told them that this phrase of empathy and solidarity is purely AMERICAN and has it's origins in, I think, breast cancer campaigns. So within days of the media denying that America has anything to do with the OBVIOUS intelligence operations by U.S., U.K, and Israeli operatives intending to destabilize Iran and create yet another Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (that's not change ANYONE can believe in!!!), we see all of these purely AMERICAN slogans popping up throughout the crowds. My money is on the fact that Neda was shot dead by a "spook" in the "game" knowing that the regime of Iran would get the blame. What information do we REALLY have that the media blackout wasn't actually caused by U.S. or U.K. conveniently turning off the transmission from their satellites which carry the Iranian signals???!!!!! This whole affair just stinks to high heaven, and all for the Israeli agenda to arm Israel to the teeth and then attempt to disarm and destabilize all other countries in the region. Can you say "Israeli Tyranny", boys and girls?

This is an insult to everyone to think that we're all so stupid to fall for these kinds of tactics. Do they also really think the Iranian government are so stupid as to intentionally create "martyrs" to solidify the cause against them???? Please!!!!!!!!!!

Love is the law, love under will.

June 8th, 2009

Much has been said concerning the recent controversy sweeping across, not only the Nation, but in particular the State of California in recent years. Proposition 8 sought to re-establish the legal definition of marriage to be an institution exclusively to be enjoyed between one man and one woman. This initiative passed the vote of the citizenry and has subsequently been heatedly challenged. But for all the wrong reasons, and here's why.

The institution of marriage as between one man and one woman is a definition that's not even Christian, not even Biblically founded. In the Bible not only was the definition of marriage between one man and one woman never heard of, it would have undermined the foundation of more than a few legitimate lineages. The house of David for one. We read in the Bible that King David most certainly had more than one wife, and other Jewish Patriarchs most certainly concurred. So why is this issue for the State of California seen as the 'protection of the sanctity of marriage' mainly by modern 'Christians', and only by modern 'Christians? Because it's not this issue that's really at stake.

The establishment of any law regarding marriage removes marriage from the churches, removes it from the Synagogues, removes it from the Sacred Groves, and places it NOT before God, but before a Legal Judge of the State. No longer is marriage to be seen as an institution based upon a foundation of love, caring, and trust; but it is now placed squarely in the middle of the institution which is the most notoriously established upon the basis of mistrust. We don't take someone into the court systems because we love them, and certainly not because we trust them. No, the courts are the places that have been firmly established upon the basis of distrust, more so than any other institution known to humankind. Far from being a 'protection of marriage' or a 'sanctification of marriage' this arrangement actually DE-sanctifies marriage more than any other action could. So why would the 'Christians' want to impose such legislation upon the State and ultimately the Nation? The first suggestion would be pure political power-grab tactics.

Unfortunately caught up in the emotional surges surrounding the issue, the 'Christians' have forgotten two very important consequences of this new legal definition. First of all, with the establishment of this legislation (Marriage is to be defined as between one man and one woman), any previous marriages that were not based upon this principle would be deemed illegitimate by the State of California. As mentioned previously King David from the Bible had many wives, so did King Solomon, and many other Jewish Patriarchs, it was the flavour of their institution of marriage. So why should Christians be concerned with the illegitimizing of the marriage of King David? Because they seem to have forgotten one very important (to them, certainly) scion of the Branch of David. In the Gospels, the lineage of Jesus Christ is very explicitly and exactly traced down from David unto the time of Christ. 'Christ' was of the 'Branch of David'. Should David's marriage be newly codified as illegitimate, then Christ would instantly gain a new title, the title of 'Bastard'. And as if this was not bad enough, there would be further implications of this status change in other areas as well.

Within the Catholic church, there is established a very strict hierarchy among its members. Many are placed above others throughout the system, with the Pope above the Cardinals, the Cardinals above the Bishops, the Bishops above the Priests, etc. But this arrangement leaves most people dumbstruck as to the status within the Catholic church of some of its most devout members. Where exactly in this grand scheme of things do the monks and more importantly for this discussion, the nuns, take their place. Short Answer: the nuns are the brides of Christ. Yes, that's right, within the monastery system of the same 'Christian' church that passed judgment through passing legislation, lies an even dirtier little secret than pedophile priests. Protected within the most devoted and sanctified fortresses of the Catholic Church sits an arrangement of marriage, which not only became de-sanctified, but also illegal in the eyes of the courts of the State of California. For the special status of every nun is DEPENDENT upon marriage NOT being defined as between one man and one woman. Certainly not as a legal status!

So what exactly drives this issue of so-called 'Same Sex Marriage', for we have just demonstrated that it has nothing to do with the Bible, with Christianity, or most certainly not the Church. No, the issue is all about the power. Legal Power. Financial Power. Political Power. The act of desanctifying marriage (by removing its authority from the church and placing that authority with the State) and removing its status as a religious institution altogether and transforming it into a legal institution, expanding the powers of government. That's right, it's not a religious issue, it's a socialist expansion issue. Proposition 8, among many other changes, expands the realms of governmental control over its citizenry, and establishes the government as the sole authority over whom one can and cannot marry. Karl Marx would be ecstatic! No long fights in the trenches, no long marches or long knives needed. With a few ballots and an initiative, Marxism gets its foundations in the State of California!

So what are the other issues at stake? Well, just about everything. Since marriage is now a legal definition judged from the Bench, it is from that same bench that all other issues that revolve around the status of marriage are now referred. Previously one's spouse could be granted citizenship through the institution of marriage. This must be retroactively repealed, for to continue to grant the right of citizenship to one based upon their status of marriage, now violates other clauses within the California State Constitution. Likewise, in danger of violating other statutes of non-discrimination within the State Constitution, all hospital visits can no longer be extended to patients based upon their status of 'marriage'. All joint filings of tax returns, the same fate, gone. For even though the people of the State of California voted to redefine the (previously religious) institution of marriage, they have NOT redefined the basis of non-discrimination within the state constitution and therefore, the status of 'marriage' can be legally used in, well, NOTHING!

As emotions rage, and 'Christians' work themselves into a froth over what they perceive to be an 'Anti-Fag Law', they unknowingly eliminated their own rights of citizenship through marriage, joint tax returns, hospital visitations, and the rest. Maybe a departure from heated discussion back to reasoned debate should have been in order a long time ago. And King David? Well, he's declared the State of California illegitimate. ;-)

April 4th, 2009

It really isn't ...


December 13th, 2008

Writer's Block: Top Dog

What kind of dog (counting mixes and mutts) gets your vote as the champion of dogs?

A CAT!!!

December 14th, 2007

Long live Hayduke!

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

Yet again the global parasite continues it's hackneyed drive to enslave the masses of the Goyim. This time it's with an extension of the DRM fiasco. You can read about it from BBC News or from the [IMSLP Temporary Wiki] resource.][Note: Link Removed: This IMSLP site has since been removed and now the link to it (imslp.on-wiki.net) just brings up a listing of porn sites, the Universal music group has succeeded in replacing the sheet music of Mozart with porn! How typically Jewish!] Keep in mind that the company mentioned in Austria is but a store-front turn-key operation for the central international corporation centered in New York and California, U.S.A.

Universal Music Publishing Group
2440 Sepulveda Blvd
Suite 100
Los Angeles, CA 90064

ARIN says:
OrgName: Universal Music Group, INC.
OrgID: UMG-12
Address: 1755 Broadway
City: New York
StateProv: NY
PostalCode: 10019
Country: US

NetRange: -
NetName: UMG-192-251-67-0
NetHandle: NET-192-251-67-0-1
Parent: NET-192-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS1.UMUSIC.COM
NameServer: NS2.UMUSIC.COM
NameServer: NS5.UMUSIC.COM
RegDate: 1992-11-24
Updated: 2006-11-08

OrgAbuseHandle: DD317-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Dolgin, Dave
OrgAbusePhone: +1-818-286-8409

NOTICE: This is a California San Fernando Valley area code.

OrgAbuseEmail: David.Dolgin@umusic.com

OrgNOCHandle: DD317-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Dolgin, Dave
OrgNOCPhone: +1-818-286-8409
OrgNOCEmail: David.Dolgin@umusic.com

OrgTechHandle: JBE28-ARIN
OrgTechName: Berg, Jane
OrgTechPhone: +1-818-777-4465
OrgTechEmail: jane.berg@umusic.com

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2007-12-13 19:10

Or fax:
(310) 235-4907
Please don't misuse this FAX number by sending solid black pages to it, since ink can be extremely expensive, and that would just force them to shut down their fax machines, effectively losing business which they need to support their lawsuits of censorship. So, again, please refrain from such practices.

The gall of such scum to try to assert their "ownership" of music produced almost exclusively by others, has crossed the line!!! I feel a boycott of all productions marketed through "the Industry" is long overdue - music, theatre, film, television, and radio. Any musicians that even so much as SIGN A RECORD CONTRACT should be shunned by all as the enemies of art and music. The simple act of signing a contract, necessarily results in the degradation of the quality and availability of music. With these types of actions these a-holes have admitted their planetary parasitic status as well as demonstrated their global agenda towards enslavement.

It's high time that music was controlled ONLY by musicians, theatre controlled ONLY by actors, literature controlled ONLY by authors, and visual graphics controlled ONLY by artists. The time of the parasitizing middle-man is over. The internet and especially the philosophy behind the open-source revolution inevitably shall expand to place all control for all forms of artistic expression back into the hands of the Creators. This is an inevitable shift due to the procession of the Equinoxes and the coming of age of the Aeon of Horus. No longer shall the school of fish (Pisces) oppress the genius of the individual (Aquarius).

Love is the law, love under will.

P.S. Even though I don't belong within any sub-culture or society, for those who choose membership within such organizations, the Free Software Foundation could perhaps offer a place for organization and education.

September 21st, 2007

Sad Day for Alladin Sane

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

Indeed it is a very sad day, after hearing about David Bowie's donation.

No one, but no one throughout this whole affair in Jena, Louisiana has really thought about how offensive this affair has become. Most people like to parrot the ideas of the Jews-Media that the poor, innocent, black kids were being unfairly treated. This is pure BULLSHIT!!!

If anyone thought over this incident and REMOVED all reference to race, there would really be nothing wrong with how the authorities of Jena acted!!! Or better yet think of what would've happened to six white skinhead neo-nazis that beat a lone black kid; the whites would have had the book thrown at them. Bowing down to the black mob, as USA has become comfortable in doing, is sending the exact WRONG message to everyone everywhere. The take-home message of USA's actions is that: If you're black you can murder a white woman (OJ), gather together and beat white kids unconscious then have everyone support you. If I was black, I would be even madder. This is the same type of crap, that influences kids to grow up to live in cages (JAIL).

So what does all this have to do with David Bowie?

Easy, having been a life-long fan of David's music, I find that I can no longer tollerate listening to any of his productions. I will probably be destroying all 200+ lp's, CD's, cassettes, videos, movies, etc. Even though some of it is very priceless, it shall be destroyed. Hopefully, Mr. Bowie himself will soon be following the collection onto the fire. By supporting the Jena 6, you have declared yourself an enemy of ALL the other races (including your own Jewish and English ones).

Bottom Line: David Bowie already died!!! . . . even if his body is still alive. David, it's waiting . . .

"Now let it first be understood that I am a god of war and vengeance."

Love is the law, love under will.
Tags: ,

May 26th, 2007

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

"Hiding the low-level details of communication
[with the TCP/IP open protocols]
helps improve productivity in several ways. First, because
programmers deal with higher-level protocol abstractions,
they do not need to learn or remember as many details
about a given hardware configuration. Thus, they can
create new programs quickly. Second, because programs
built using higher-level abstractions are not restricted
to a particular computer architecture or a particular
network hardware, they do not need to be changed when
computers or networks are replaced or reconfigured.
Third, because application programs built using
higher-level protocols are independent of the
underlying hardware, they can provide direct
communication between an arbitrary pair of computers.
Programmers do not need to build a special version of
application software for each type of computer or each
type of network. Instead, software built to use protocols
is general-purpose; the same code can be compiled and
run on an arbitrary computer."
Douglas E. Comer "The Complete TCP/IP Training Course"

Although the above paragraph applies to the particular situations of programming and working with the TCP/IP protocols, this concept is also the reason for many of the problems that the entire software programming community is faced with today at an alarmingly increasing rate. Basically, modern programmers have forgotten one of the most basic fundamentals of computer programming - the efficiency of code. Back when algore was just inventing the internet (note: that was a sarcastic joke :P ), the fewer lines of code in your program the better. Today with the predominance of huge monster application suites (of which "Microfart Swindles" is an example), most programmers' major concern has become the utilization of the latest technologies and the ensuing compatibility. While on the surface this may seem to be a positive force of motivation for continued invention and innovation, at the root it is really a poisonous thought that has the potential to turn the planet into a smoldering toxic waste dump. Let me explain step by step.

First, when a programmer decides that their new program will be supported upon all the latest technologies (e.g. Vista, dual-core processors, etc), they have a tendency to ignore the backwards compatibility issues of support for older technologies (e.g. 8088, 640K RAM, etc). This usually results in current programs being incompatible with older technologies until they begin to procede (as some of the worst offenders have) by issuing hardware compatibility check programs to tell you to buy newer hardware in order to use their software. The reaction to the implications of this approach has been, "Well, who wants to use older computer systems? The newer one's give better performance anyway." and understandably so with reference to some of the major innovations we have seen. However, left unchecked and in conjunction with the compounding exponential growth of technologies, the major detrimental result that's right around the corner will be an exponentially increasing re-issuance of application and OS programs. It will not be inconceivable to find in the near future computer programs being released that ONLY function on dual (i.e. tandem) dual-core processors.

While this may not seem to be such a big deal to many, it is of the utmost importance to understand, and here's why:

The chips and circuitry contained within most modern electronic devices are toxic waste. A back of the envelope calculation taking into consideration the purchase of a new computer system (let's say) every five years by all the computer users on the planet (especially considering the recent industrial revolution that can be barely seen through the clouds of burnt-coal in China.) should give anyone of even modest imagination pause for thought. Pawning off the "disposable planet" ultra-consumerist attitude of Americans onto the rest of the world is a crime of far greater implications and consequences than any other phenomenon known to man. If programmers would think for a moment that their initial philosophical approach to writing code could result in being buried in megatons of toxic waste, perhaps then they could be in a position to begin some real (and lasting) innovations for our future.

Since John wrote in his first letter (I John 2:15)

"Love not the world, neither the things that
are in the world. If any man love the world,
the love of the Father is not in him."

I must therefore here fully declare that the only road to salvation is the following of Anti-Christ unto a greener and healthier world. If "the love of the Father" concerns you, please consider Liber Cheth vel Vallum Abiegni sub figura CLXVI:10:

"Thou hast love; tear thy mother from thine heart, and
spit in the face of thy father. Let thy foot trample the belly of
thy wife, and let the babe at her breast be the prey of dogs
and vultures."


To return to the point, modern software programmers remind me of many of the peasants that I saw while living in Africa. It seems that most of them live by the rule of "out of sight - out of mind". It can be quite comical to see them take out the weekly garbage by walking out to the front porch and with a masonic-heave-ho TM fling their garbage bags up and over their head onto the roof of their house. Even more entertaining is when the occasional weight-load becomes too great and they are showered with old, stinking, fly-infested garbage as it collapses the roof of their house onto them. It should be a very valuable lesson to us not to emulate such clear stupidity with older obsolete computer hardware. Writing programs first from a basis of support for the 8088 chipset/instruction set (or perhaps 80286, or even Pentium I), and then adding optional code to support x64 or whatever should become the basic philosophy of coding in order to preserve the vast amount of learning tools/oxygen sources/food sources/friends available to us and known as plants and animals.

To tear out a rainforest for greed of the money that might be made from the lumber, is morally equivalent (and just as retarded) to snipping out portions of your own lungs in order to be able to poison yourself later with pesticides trying to kill off the termites that WILL BE attracted by that lumber. A better approach would be to utilize other more sustainable materials for house-building in the first place. Learn from Nature and adjust your lifestyle as appropriate, she really is the best teacher. The 40's and 50's generations have set in motion the destruction of OUR future, and now the 60's generation has become the same thing if not worse. To sum it up in a sentence (with slight apologies to Dr. Timothy Leary, Sir Aleister Crowley, and Malcolm X for the cut-up method):

Turn On, Tune In, and the earth shall grow green at my coming, by any means necessary.


Love is the law, love under will.
(who's musing on just how wrongly this post will be misinterpreted - and then laughing.)
Powered by LiveJournal.com